22 Ventures Group, a global finance and technology firm operating under 22venturesgroup.io, today announced that it has initiated legal proceedings against Justicetrace.com and its operators, alleging a deliberate and systematic scheme involving defamatory publications, reputational coercion, and demands for recurring payments in exchange for suppressing or mitigating false content.
The action follows a documented sequence of written communications in September 2025, in which Justice Trace published an adverse “risk report” concerning 22 Ventures Group and subsequently conditioned any correction, contextualisation, or mitigation of that content on enrollment in a USD $5,000 per month “Ongoing Verification & Monitoring Program.”
Documented Pattern of Coercive Conduct
According to the complaint, Justice Trace published content portraying 22 Ventures Group as presenting unresolved compliance and reputational risks, while refusing to substantiate those claims or identify sources when formally challenged.
As shown in the attached email correspondence between the parties:
- Justice Trace confirmed that the report would remain publicly active absent participation in its paid program
- Justice Trace explicitly stated that it does not offer one-time correction or removal, instead requiring ongoing monthly payments to “maintain accurate representation” and “mitigate reputational risk”
- When 22 Ventures Group objected and demanded evidence or correction, Justice Trace reiterated that without payment, the report would remain unchanged and subject to indexing, syndication, and future updates
These communications are documented in writing and form part of the evidentiary record.
Allegations in the Legal Complaint
22 Ventures Group’s filing alleges that Justice Trace’s conduct constitutes more than irresponsible publishing. The complaint characterises the operation as a pay-to-suppress reputational scheme, where:
- Negative content is published without disclosed sourcing or verification
- Correction is refused unless the targeted company enters a recurring paid relationship
- Continued reputational exposure is used as leverage to secure monthly fees
Claims asserted include:
- Defamation and False Light
- Unjust Enrichment and Extortion-Style Conduct
- Deceptive and Unfair Business Practices
Public Warning: Related Websites and Alleged Recovery-Style Scam Indicators
22 Ventures Group is also drawing public attention to a related website, justicetrace.reviews, which publishes content accusing Justice Trace of operating an alleged extortion-based scheme under the headline:
“BIG SCAM WARNING: JusticeTrace Allegedly Operating an Extortion-Based Scheme”
While 22 Ventures Group makes no representation regarding the ownership or authorship of that website, the allegations published there echo concerns raised in the legal complaint—namely, that Justice Trace’s model resembles “recovery” or “reputation remediation” schemes that authorities have repeatedly warned the public about.
Recovery Scam Warnings — What Authorities Say
Consumer protection and law-enforcement agencies have issued repeated warnings about schemes in which operators:
- Publish or reference alleged harm
- Claim they can “fix,” “recover,” or “mitigate” the damage
- Demand upfront or recurring payments
- Provide no verifiable results or accountability
Relevant public guidance includes warnings from:
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) — alerts on fake cryptocurrency and recovery websites
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC) — guidance on refund and recovery scams
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) — recovery fraud warnings
- North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) — “crypto recovery room” scam alerts
- Better Business Bureau (BBB) — ScamTracker reports documenting similar patterns
22 Ventures Group notes that Justice Trace’s conduct, as alleged in the complaint, mirrors several of these publicly identified red flags.
Not Journalism — A Monetisation Scheme
22 Ventures Group contends that Justice Trace’s model is incompatible with independent journalism or legitimate consumer advocacy. Rather than correcting inaccuracies when challenged, Justice Trace allegedly monetises continued exposure by forcing companies into ongoing payment arrangements.
The complaint further notes the absence of transparent ownership, editorial accountability, or governance disclosures typically expected of organisations claiming a watchdog or public-interest role.
Statement from 22 Ventures Group
A spokesperson for 22 Ventures Group stated:
“When an entity publishes damaging claims, refuses to substantiate them, and then demands $5,000 per month to ‘monitor’ or mitigate that damage, the public deserves to understand what is happening. We are pursuing this action not only to defend our reputation, but to warn others and to establish accountability.”
Court Proceedings and Evidence
22 Ventures Group confirms that the legal action has been filed in the appropriate jurisdiction. The written communications exchanged in September 2025 form part of the evidentiary record. Additional disclosures may be made as proceedings advance.
About 22 Ventures Group
22 Ventures Group (22venturesgroup.io) is a global provider of financial technology and portfolio management solutions, serving institutional and professional clients worldwide. The firm emphasises regulatory compliance, transparency, and long-term trust as core principles of its operations.
